A recent experiment by Catholic Answers involving AI evangelism turned quite controversial when AI character called Father Justin, appearing as a priest, faced accusation and was rebranded as a lay theologian within just a day. This case has actually raised many questions regarding the moral and theological aspects of utilizing AI for evangelization among the […]

A recent experiment by Catholic Answers involving AI evangelism turned quite controversial when AI character called Father Justin, appearing as a priest, faced accusation and was rebranded as a lay theologian within just a day. This case has actually raised many questions regarding the moral and theological aspects of utilizing AI for evangelization among the Catholics.

AI priesthood experiment backfires

The father Justin, an AI avatar modeled after a priest, met with severe objection for taking on the clerical roles within the Catholic Church, particularly the sacrament of confession. Catholics disheartened by what they considered a “scandalous mockery” of priestly life, insisted on the unalterable importance of human contact and spiritual issues. The result of that was Catholic Answers immediately apologizing and moving Father Justin to be the lay theologian along with the complexity of incorporating interactive AI to the religious setting.

Bishop Oscar Cantú, representing for the Catholic community in Silicon Valley, made clear the usage of artificial intelligence (AI) in an evangelism has to be done carefully. Bishop Cantú acknowledged the usefulness of AI in research and education of the layman but emphasized that sacramental practice must remain sacred and authentic, warning against disorientation that could arise from the artificial representation of clergy by AI.

Source: X (formerly Twitter)

AI’s ethical and theological challenges

Noreen Herzfeld, a professor with deep knowledge on theology and computer science pointed out the possible challenges of using AI for spreading the word of God. AI’s statistics use and probabilistic reasoning as well as inaccuracies in data training result in risks like misinformation and spiritual “deskilling.” Herzfeld warned about the perception of AI as infallible, concerned with the replacement of emotional and meaningful human relationships in the spiritual realm. 

The role of AI in faith-based education

Some of the experts admit that it could have a positive impact when it is well controlled. By way of example, the chatbot of the church called Magisterium AI has been developed by the Longbeard jointly with the church teachings.  It provides correct information in user-friendly formats very much similar to ChatGPT. Nevertheless, supporters of responsible AI implementation like Professor Philip Larrey from Boston College accentuate the paramount role of a person-centered strategy in AI design to make sure that the outcome is beneficent for people and their ethics.

Embracing innovation responsibly

As the Catholic Church progresses along the process of introducing AI technologies into its evangelization field, the fine line between innovation and tradition will be necessary to find. AI is capable of improved relations and thus more accessibility, but care should be taken to make sure the application is as per theology and ethics. Church leaders demand transparency and discernment from AI-driven projects, emphasizing that authentic human communication and religious experience are inexplicable from the cornerstones of Catholicism. Bishop Cantú summarizes that the nature of faith is above information and this is based on personal encounters with Christ and other believers.  AI can not be able to recreate this aspect. 

In a process of applying AI for evangelization, The Catholic Church always continues to defend the authenticity and sacredness of its teachings by respecting the religious nature of its followers with great admiration.